Car Test
|
R0272 | |
|
October 2002 |
||
| Seat Ibiza | ||
| Printer Friendly Page | Featured model: 1.9TDi SE 5 door | |
|
Like the Arosa, this latest Ibiza bears a close resemblance to a VW – in this case, the Polo. However, any good cook will tell you that how you mix the ingredients makes all the difference; in this case, how much spice is added, as well.
The Ibiza has been set up to be fun to drive, so the suspension is set firmer – an S or this SE feels close to the Polo Sport in its responses and the Ibiza Sport’s chassis is uncompromisingly set up to optimise cornering prowess. Similarly, the top-powered Ibiza (the 130bhp version of this 1.9 diesel) delivers its considerable accelerative thrust with a degree of mechanical brashness, whereas this still remarkably rapid 100bhp version is all sweetness and ease. Actually, in company with the Polo, this installation is the first to quell those unwelcome driveline tremors, below 1500rpm, that all previous VW Group products using this engine have suffered. This is important, because 1500rpm on this diesel amounts to 45mph in top gear, so in traffic, low-speed flexibility is important. It’s an important contribution to the model’s remarkable fuel economy, as well; around the lanes or suburbs, this Ibiza feels delightfully uncomplaining in its (still tall) fourth ratio and will actually mumble along at idle speed without complaint – then accelerate away again. Also, because of its long stride, 70mph cruising (at over 50mpg) is subdued and relaxing, and although our experience of the other (petrol) engines in the Ibiza range confirms that they too are refined, this is the one that gets our vote for all-round satisfaction. Interior differences between Polo and Ibiza are subtle; there are the same supportive seats with reasonable legspace, there are fewer anti-slip surfaces and the lighting and heater knobs are harder to grasp; the red-hued dial lighting is clearer, though. The S pack is pleasingly complete, with a simpler form of air conditioning that’s still perfectly acceptable. Three lap-and-diagonal seatbelts with their attendant head restraints, two air-bags, ABS and a 60/40 split, folding back seat, are all standard. In terms of costs, this 100bhp TDi is much cheaper than the equivalent engine in the Polo – indeed, the Polo 1.4 TDi is on price-parity. There is an equivalent Skoda Fabia, however, that’s worth serious consideration, especially if you prefer a more compliant ride; the front seats aren’t so supportive, however. There are small differences in the warranty terms between the three brands, as well. Again, the Skoda’s seems the least restrictive, apart from its anti-rust cover lapsing two years sooner. Remember also that these modern diesels are sophisticated and longer-term running costs are dependent on reliability; this one also demands special (expensive) oil and a new camshaft drive belt at 60,000 miles – when the warranty expires. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
=option